A list of judicial misconduct committed by Magistrate Judge Timothy M. Boudewyns

Read Comments Submitted About Magistrate Boudewyns

Complaint BOUDE001  Case 94-0436P  Garganta v Union Central .  Complaint filed by Mr. Garganta, the Pro Se Plaintiff.  Magistrate Boudewyns and Judge Pettine made it impossible for Mr. Garganta to have a fair breach of contract trial because of the following:

• Mr. Garganta was not allowed to show the jury the evidence submitted to Union Central on the claim.
• Mr. Garganta was not allowed to show the jury the evidence rejected by Union Central on Mr. Garganta's claim.
• Mr. Garganta was not allowed to show the jury the evidence required by Mr. Garganta's policy with Union Central.
• Mr. Garganta was not allowed a brief extension of time after his only medical expert witness became ill.
• Any testimony from Mr. Garganta's witnesses could not be about the excluded evidence mentioned above.
• All procedures set up by the State of Rhode Island regarding legal proof of disability and procedures for establishing the existence of a disability were ignored by the District Court and were not allowed to be part of Mr. Garganta's breach of contract trial.
• The Federal District Court disregarded the proof of loss requirements and other contractual agreements between Union Central and Mr. Garganta.

The District Court's reasoning was the evidence eliminated from the trial was irrelevant and prejudicial to the insurance company.
Magistrate Boudewyns and Judge Pettine acted in collusion with and assisted Union Central in breaching their contractual obligations with Mr. Garganta.
A close analysis of this case will reveal nothing short of institutionalized, court sponsored insurance fraud.  The District Court's handling of this case was a setup guaranteeing a loss for Mr. Garganta.

Use The Back Button On Your Browser Or Go to the Caught! Home Page

Complaint BOUDE002  See complaint filed by Citizen Don Gill [Case Gill v Rhode Island 94-0331B] asserting complete manipulation of civil procedure, judicial bias, judicial intimidation, unauthorized practice of law, altered transcripts and manipulation and denial of due process and other civil rights.  This case is a classic example of the shenanigans Citizens without influence experience in Rhode Island courts.

EMAIL Caught! right now!